↓ Skip to main content

Measuring and understanding motivation among community health workers in rural health facilities in India-a mixed method study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring and understanding motivation among community health workers in rural health facilities in India-a mixed method study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12913-016-1614-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaya Prasad Tripathy, Sonu Goel, Ajay M. V. Kumar

Abstract

Motivated human resource is the key to improve health system performance and retention of health workers. There is scanty literature on measuring motivation of health workers in India. Thus, the objective of this study was to measure and identify important aspects of health workers' motivation in North India. A mixed method study design was adopted. Under the quantitative component, we interviewed randomly selected 62 community health workers (CHWs) in 18 sub-centres in two blocks of District Ambala, Haryana, India using a structured motivation scale. In-depth interviews were also carried out with 18 CHWs to explore the sources of motivation. The age of respondents and training in the past 12 months were found to be significantly associated with motivation. Job burnout, poor personal health, job insecurity and less career development opportunities were the individual level de-motivators, whereas not being able to fulfil family roles and poor supportive supervision were identified as environmental factors for poor motivation. Love for work, and financial incentives were individual level motivators, while community support and recognition, organizational commitment and pride, regular training were identified as environmental level motivators. Non-financial motivators such as interpersonal relations, family support, skill and career development opportunities require more attention. Regular need-based training is essential to maintain high levels of motivation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 241 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 15%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Unspecified 15 6%
Other 51 21%
Unknown 73 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Social Sciences 23 9%
Unspecified 15 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 4%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 86 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,467,278
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,487
of 7,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,252
of 361,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#210
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.