You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalent, protective, and convergent IgG recognition of SARS-CoV-2 non-RBD spike epitopes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abg5268 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William N Voss, Yixuan J Hou, Nicole V Johnson, George Delidakis, Jin Eyun Kim, Kamyab Javanmardi, Andrew P Horton, Foteini Bartzoka, Chelsea J Paresi, Yuri Tanno, Chia-Wei Chou, Shawn A Abbasi, Whitney Pickens, Katia George, Daniel R Boutz, Dalton M Towers, Jonathan R McDaniel, Daniel Billick, Jule Goike, Lori Rowe, Dhwani Batra, Jan Pohl, Justin Lee, Shivaprakash Gangappa, Suryaprakash Sambhara, Michelle Gadush, Nianshuang Wang, Maria D Person, Brent L Iverson, Jimmy D Gollihar, John M Dye, Andrew S Herbert, Ilya J Finkelstein, Ralph S Baric, Jason S McLellan, George Georgiou, Jason J Lavinder, Gregory C Ippolito |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 312 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 4% |
| India | 12 | 4% |
| France | 12 | 4% |
| Spain | 10 | 3% |
| Mexico | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Argentina | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 161 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 242 | 78% |
| Scientists | 52 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 196 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 27 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 66 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 342. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#97,814
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,250
of 83,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,003
of 456,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#88
of 875 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 875 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.