↓ Skip to main content

Chronic stress in practice assistants: An analytic approach comparing four machine learning classifiers with a standard logistic regression model

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic stress in practice assistants: An analytic approach comparing four machine learning classifiers with a standard logistic regression model
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0250842
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arezoo Bozorgmehr, Anika Thielmann, Birgitta Weltermann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Unspecified 3 7%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 21 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 23 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#135,281
of 199,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,973
of 439,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,951
of 2,928 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,928 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.