↓ Skip to main content

Anthropogenic edge effects in habitat selection by sun bears in a protected area

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Biology, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anthropogenic edge effects in habitat selection by sun bears in a protected area
Published in
Wildlife Biology, May 2021
DOI 10.2981/wlb.00776
Authors

Thye Lim Tee, Frank T. van Manen, Petra Kretzschmar, Stuart P. Sharp, Siew Te Wong, Sumbin Gadas, Shyamala Ratnayeke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 28%
Environmental Science 7 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 12 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,513,877
of 21,604,458 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Biology
#278
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,662
of 341,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Biology
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,604,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.