Title |
Make it SIMPLE: enhanced shock management by focused cardiac ultrasound
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-016-0176-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ka Leung Mok |
Abstract |
Shock is a spectrum of circulatory failure that, if not properly managed, would lead to high mortality. Special diagnostic and treatment strategies are essential to save lives. However, clinical and laboratory findings are always non-specific, resulting in clinical dilemmas. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) has emerged as one of the power tools for clinicians to answer simple clinical questions and guide subsequent management in hypotensive patients. This article will review the development and utility of FoCUS in different types of shock. The sonographic features and ultrasound enhanced management of hypotensive patients by a de novo "SIMPLE" approach will be described. Current evidence on FoCUS will also be reviewed. Focused cardiac ultrasound provides timely and valuable information for the evaluation of shock. It helps to improve the diagnostic accuracy, narrow the possible differential diagnoses, and guide specific management. SIMPLE is an easy-to-remember mnemonic for non-cardiologists or novice clinical sonographers to apply FoCUS and interpret the specific sonographic findings when evaluating patients in shock. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 12% |
Mexico | 4 | 6% |
Spain | 4 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
Colombia | 3 | 5% |
Slovenia | 2 | 3% |
Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
Malaysia | 2 | 3% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 28 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 47 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 159 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 29 | 18% |
Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
Researcher | 16 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 9% |
Other | 38 | 24% |
Unknown | 29 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 65% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 23% |