↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Individual-Level Social Capital on Quality of Life among AIDS Patients in China

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Individual-Level Social Capital on Quality of Life among AIDS Patients in China
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048888
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Ma, Xia Qin, Ruoling Chen, Niannian Li, Ren Chen, Zhi Hu

Abstract

With growing recognition of the social determinants of health, social capital is an increasingly important construct in international health. However, the application of social capital discourse in response to HIV infection remains preliminary. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of social capital on quality of life (QoL) among adult patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 26%
Social Sciences 12 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Psychology 7 7%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,155,634
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#115,680
of 193,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,933
of 183,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,601
of 4,904 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,904 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.