↓ Skip to main content

Does a loss of TDP-43 function cause neurodegeneration?

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurodegeneration, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does a loss of TDP-43 function cause neurodegeneration?
Published in
Molecular Neurodegeneration, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1750-1326-7-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zuo-Shang Xu

Abstract

In 2006, TAR-DNA binding protein 43 kDa (TDP-43) was discovered to be in the intracellular aggregates in the degenerating cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), two fatal neurodegenerative diseases [1,2]. ALS causes motor neuron degeneration leading to paralysis [3,4]. FTLD causes neuronal degeneration in the frontal and temporal cortices leading to personality changes and a loss of executive function [5]. The discovery triggered a flurry of research activity that led to the discovery of TDP-43 mutations in ALS patients and the widespread presence of TDP-43 aggregates in numerous neurodegenerative diseases. A key question regarding the role of TDP-43 is whether it causes neurotoxicity by a gain of function or a loss of function. The gain-of-function hypothesis has received much attention primarily based on the striking neurodegenerative phenotypes in numerous TDP-43-overexpression models. In this review, I will draw attention to the loss-of-function hypothesis, which postulates that mutant TDP-43 causes neurodegeneration by a loss of function, and in addition, by exerting a dominant-negative effect on the wild-type TDP-43 allele. Furthermore, I will discuss how a loss of function can cause neurodegeneration in patients where TDP-43 is not mutated, review the literature in model systems to discuss how the current data support the loss-of-function mechanism and highlight some key questions for testing this hypothesis in the future.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 176 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 23%
Student > Bachelor 31 17%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 10%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 17%
Neuroscience 26 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 11%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 26 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,496,106
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#665
of 977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,220
of 181,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.