↓ Skip to main content

Sense of agency in health and disease: A review of cue integration approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Consciousness & Cognition, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
317 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
452 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sense of agency in health and disease: A review of cue integration approaches
Published in
Consciousness & Cognition, September 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.W. Moore, P.C. Fletcher

Abstract

Sense of agency (SoA) is a compelling but fragile experience that is augmented or attenuated by internal signals and by external cues. A disruption in SoA may characterise individual symptoms of mental illness such as delusions of control. Indeed, it has been argued that generic SoA disturbances may lie at the heart of delusions and hallucinations that characterise schizophrenia. A clearer understanding of how sensorimotor, perceptual and environmental cues complement, or compete with, each other in engendering SoA may prove valuable in deepening our understanding the agency disruptions that characterise certain focal neurological disorders and mental illnesses. Here we examine the integration of SoA cues in health and illness, describing a simple framework of this integration based on Bayesian principles. We extend this to consider how alterations in cue integration may lead to aberrant experiences of agency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 433 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 21%
Researcher 60 13%
Student > Bachelor 60 13%
Student > Master 58 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 75 17%
Unknown 78 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 172 38%
Neuroscience 51 11%
Engineering 31 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 6%
Computer Science 19 4%
Other 51 11%
Unknown 102 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Consciousness & Cognition
#1,164
of 1,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,148
of 137,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Consciousness & Cognition
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.