↓ Skip to main content

Safety Evaluation of a Bioglass–Polylactic Acid Composite Scaffold Seeded with Progenitor Cells in a Rat Skull Critical-Size Bone Defect

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety Evaluation of a Bioglass–Polylactic Acid Composite Scaffold Seeded with Progenitor Cells in a Rat Skull Critical-Size Bone Defect
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0087642
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karam Eldesoqi, Dirk Henrich, Abeer M. El-Kady, Mahmoud S. Arbid, Bothaina M. Abd El-Hady, Ingo Marzi, Caroline Seebach

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Student > Master 20 24%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Researcher 6 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Engineering 10 12%
Chemistry 7 8%
Materials Science 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#93,037
of 199,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,160
of 310,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,381
of 5,704 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,704 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.