You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Association between Proximity to Animal Feeding Operations and Community Health: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0009530 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annette M. O'Connor, Brent Auvermann, Danelle Bickett-Weddle, Steve Kirkhorn, Jan M. Sargeant, Alejandro Ramirez, Susanna G. Von Essen |
| Abstract |
A systematic review was conducted for the association between animal feeding operations (AFOs) and the health of individuals living near AFOs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 50% |
| Argentina | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 23% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 28% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2017.
All research outputs
#971,222
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,071
of 199,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,043
of 94,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#63
of 669 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 669 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.