You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A framework for allocating conservation resources among multiple threats and actions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Biology, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1111/cobi.13748 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joslin L. Moore, Abbey E. Camaclang, Alana L. Moore, Cindy E. Hauser, Michael C. Runge, Victor Picheny, Libby Rumpff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 6 | 35% |
United States | 3 | 18% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
India | 1 | 6% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
Scientists | 5 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 45% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 6 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 17% |
Decision Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,953,790
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,471
of 3,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,913
of 437,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#36
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.