↓ Skip to main content

Unraveling Protein Networks with Power Graph Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
citeulike
34 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unraveling Protein Networks with Power Graph Analysis
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loïc Royer, Matthias Reimann, Bill Andreopoulos, Michael Schroeder

Abstract

Networks play a crucial role in computational biology, yet their analysis and representation is still an open problem. Power Graph Analysis is a lossless transformation of biological networks into a compact, less redundant representation, exploiting the abundance of cliques and bicliques as elementary topological motifs. We demonstrate with five examples the advantages of Power Graph Analysis. Investigating protein-protein interaction networks, we show how the catalytic subunits of the casein kinase II complex are distinguishable from the regulatory subunits, how interaction profiles and sequence phylogeny of SH3 domains correlate, and how false positive interactions among high-throughput interactions are spotted. Additionally, we demonstrate the generality of Power Graph Analysis by applying it to two other types of networks. We show how power graphs induce a clustering of both transcription factors and target genes in bipartite transcription networks, and how the erosion of a phosphatase domain in type 22 non-receptor tyrosine phosphatases is detected. We apply Power Graph Analysis to high-throughput protein interaction networks and show that up to 85% (56% on average) of the information is redundant. Experimental networks are more compressible than rewired ones of same degree distribution, indicating that experimental networks are rich in cliques and bicliques. Power Graphs are a novel representation of networks, which reduces network complexity by explicitly representing re-occurring network motifs. Power Graphs compress up to 85% of the edges in protein interaction networks and are applicable to all types of networks such as protein interactions, regulatory networks, or homology networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 5%
United Kingdom 12 4%
Germany 6 2%
Spain 5 2%
Slovenia 5 2%
France 4 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 216 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 29%
Researcher 75 27%
Student > Master 30 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 23 8%
Professor 16 6%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 13 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 40%
Computer Science 68 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 8%
Engineering 13 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 16 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,664,202
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,389
of 9,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,576
of 95,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#8
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.