You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the Cost of Global Biodiversity and Conservation Knowledge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0160640 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diego Juffe-Bignoli, Thomas M. Brooks, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Richard B. Jenkins, Kaia Boe, Michael Hoffmann, Ariadne Angulo, Steve Bachman, Monika Böhm, Neil Brummitt, Kent E. Carpenter, Pat J. Comer, Neil Cox, Annabelle Cuttelod, William R. T. Darwall, Moreno Di Marco, Lincoln D. C. Fishpool, Bárbara Goettsch, Melanie Heath, Craig Hilton-Taylor, Jon Hutton, Tim Johnson, Ackbar Joolia, David A. Keith, Penny F. Langhammer, Jennifer Luedtke, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Maiko Lutz, Ian May, Rebecca M. Miller, María A. Oliveira-Miranda, Mike Parr, Caroline M. Pollock, Gina Ralph, Jon Paul Rodríguez, Carlo Rondinini, Jane Smart, Simon Stuart, Andy Symes, Andrew W. Tordoff, Stephen Woodley, Bruce Young, Naomi Kingston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 134 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 22% |
| United States | 11 | 8% |
| Canada | 8 | 6% |
| Australia | 5 | 4% |
| South Africa | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 76% |
| Scientists | 29 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 275 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 74 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 56 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 102 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 75 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 66 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2020.
All research outputs
#451,577
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,303
of 225,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,362
of 339,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#124
of 4,311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.