You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Notch3 Is Dispensable for Thymocyte β-Selection and Notch1-Induced T Cell Leukemogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0024937 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Suliman, Joanne Tan, Keli Xu, Philaretos C. Kousis, Paul E. Kowalski, Greg Chang, Sean E. Egan, Cynthia Guidos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 26% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 16% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#93,037
of 199,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,513
of 127,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,039
of 2,515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.