You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Natural history, trajectory, and management of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the United Kingdom
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-021-06389-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brijesh V. Patel, Shlomi Haar, Rhodri Handslip, Chaiyawan Auepanwiriyakul, Teresa Mei-Ling Lee, Sunil Patel, J. Alex Harston, Feargus Hosking-Jervis, Donna Kelly, Barnaby Sanderson, Barbara Borgatta, Kate Tatham, Ingeborg Welters, Luigi Camporota, Anthony C. Gordon, Matthieu Komorowski, David Antcliffe, John R. Prowle, Zudin Puthucheary, Aldo A. Faisal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 210 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 45 | 21% |
| Mexico | 12 | 6% |
| Italy | 8 | 4% |
| Spain | 8 | 4% |
| Brazil | 7 | 3% |
| Colombia | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 72 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 129 | 61% |
| Scientists | 37 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 34 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 175 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 66 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 65 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 226. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
#174,836
of 25,934,828 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#123
of 5,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,105
of 457,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.