You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ten Simple Rules to Protect Your Intellectual Property
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002766 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Jolly, Anthony C. Fletcher, Philip E. Bourne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 27 | 30% |
| United States | 16 | 18% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| Estonia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 37 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 70% |
| Scientists | 19 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 166 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 37 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 49 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#592,003
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#423
of 9,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,136
of 199,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#4
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.