↓ Skip to main content

To Use or Not to Use – Practitioners’ Perceptions of an Open Web Portal for Young Patients With Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Internet Research, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To Use or Not to Use – Practitioners’ Perceptions of an Open Web Portal for Young Patients With Diabetes
Published in
Journal of Medical Internet Research, January 2012
DOI 10.2196/jmir.1987
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam Nordfeldt

Abstract

Health care professionals' attitudes can be a significant factor in their acceptance and efficient use of information technology, so they need to have more knowledge about this resource to enhance their participation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 25%
Social Sciences 4 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2012.
All research outputs
#1,013,762
of 5,148,643 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1,028
of 1,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,233
of 84,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,148,643 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them