↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: SAPS 3 score as a predictive factor for postoperative referral to intensive care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: SAPS 3 score as a predictive factor for postoperative referral to intensive care unit
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13613-016-0180-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

João M. Silva, Helder Marcus Costa Rocha, Henrique Tadashi Katayama, Leandro Ferreira Dias, Mateus Barros de Paula, Leusi Magda Romano Andraus, Jose Maria Correa Silva, Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,002
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#829
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,252
of 313,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#24
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.