↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Environmental and Lifestyle Factors on Hypertension: Shimane COHRE Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Environmental and Lifestyle Factors on Hypertension: Shimane COHRE Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsuyoshi Hamano, Yoshinari Kimura, Miwako Takeda, Masayuki Yamasaki, Minoru Isomura, Toru Nabika, Kuninori Shiwaku

Abstract

In recent years there has been increasing evidence of an association between residential remoteness and hypertension (HTN); however, no study has examined the effects of residential remoteness-lifestyle associations on HTN. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of residential remoteness, as measured by road network distance and elevation, and lifestyle associations, including access to daily products as a measure of car use, on HTN in a rural region in Japan.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 28%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2012.
All research outputs
#12,671,361
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#97,993
of 193,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,691
of 182,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,095
of 4,829 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,829 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.