↓ Skip to main content

Using Digital RNA Counting and Flow Cytometry to Compare mRNA with Protein Expression in Acute Leukemias

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using Digital RNA Counting and Flow Cytometry to Compare mRNA with Protein Expression in Acute Leukemias
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Fernandez, Max Solenthaler, Olivier Spertini, Stephane Quarroz, Alicia Rovo, Pierre-Yves Lovey, Leda Leoncini, Sylvie Ruault-Jungblut, Mathilde D’Asaro, Olivier Schaad, Mylène Docquier, Patrick Descombes, Thomas Matthes

Abstract

The diagnosis of malignant hematologic diseases has become increasingly complex during the last decade. It is based on the interpretation of results from different laboratory analyses, which range from microscopy to gene expression profiling. Recently, a method for the analysis of RNA phenotypes has been developed, the nCounter technology (Nanostring® Technologies), which allows for simultaneous quantification of hundreds of RNA molecules in biological samples. We evaluated this technique in a Swiss multi-center study on eighty-six samples from acute leukemia patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
India 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 35 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 25%
Researcher 10 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,942,060
of 24,219,576 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,903
of 208,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,985
of 185,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,495
of 4,833 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,219,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,833 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.