↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Effectiveness of Aspirin Dosing in Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Effectiveness of Aspirin Dosing in Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, May 2021
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2102137
Pubmed ID
Authors

W Schuyler Jones, Hillary Mulder, Lisa M Wruck, Michael J Pencina, Sunil Kripalani, Daniel Muñoz, David L Crenshaw, Mark B Effron, Richard N Re, Kamal Gupta, R David Anderson, Carl J Pepine, Eileen M Handberg, Brittney R Manning, Sandeep K Jain, Saket Girotra, Danielle Riley, Darren A DeWalt, Jeff Whittle, Ythan H Goldberg, Veronique L Roger, Rachel Hess, Catherine P Benziger, Peter Farrehi, Li Zhou, Daniel E Ford, Kevin Haynes, Jeffrey J VanWormer, Kirk U Knowlton, Jennifer L Kraschnewski, Tamar S Polonsky, Dan J Fintel, Faraz S Ahmad, James C McClay, James R Campbell, Douglas S Bell, Gregg C Fonarow, Steven M Bradley, Anuradha Paranjape, Matthew T Roe, Holly R Robertson, Lesley H Curtis, Amber G Sharlow, Lisa G Berdan, Bradley G Hammill, Debra F Harris, Laura G Qualls, Guillaume Marquis-Gravel, Madelaine F Modrow, Gregory M Marcus, Thomas W Carton, Elizabeth Nauman, Lemuel R Waitman, Abel N Kho, Elizabeth A Shenkman, Kathleen M McTigue, Rainu Kaushal, Frederick A Masoudi, Elliott M Antman, Desiree R Davidson, Kevin Edgley, James G Merritt, Linda S Brown, Doris N Zemon, Thomas E McCormick, Jacqueline D Alikhaani, Kenneth C Gregoire, Russell L Rothman, Robert A Harrington, Adrian F Hernandez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 455 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Master 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 88 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Unspecified 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 94 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 465. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#59,781
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,873
of 32,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,963
of 457,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#61
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.