You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pre-, Per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0048739 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diane S. Lazard, Christophe Vincent, Frédéric Venail, Paul Van de Heyning, Eric Truy, Olivier Sterkers, Piotr H. Skarzynski, Henryk Skarzynski, Karen Schauwers, Stephen O'Leary, Deborah Mawman, Bert Maat, Andrea Kleine-Punte, Alexander M. Huber, Kevin Green, Paul J. Govaerts, Bernard Fraysse, Richard Dowell, Norbert Dillier, Elaine Burke, Andy Beynon, François Bergeron, Deniz Başkent, Françoise Artières, Peter J. Blamey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 342 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 18% |
| Researcher | 55 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 15% |
| Unknown | 71 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 26% |
| Engineering | 35 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 34 | 10% |
| Psychology | 21 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 17% |
| Unknown | 87 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#322,525
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,573
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,656
of 198,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#70
of 4,851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.