↓ Skip to main content

Protocolo de Avaliação Miofuncional Orofacial com Escores Expandido: AMIOFE-E LACTENTES (6-24 MESES)

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocolo de Avaliação Miofuncional Orofacial com Escores Expandido: AMIOFE-E LACTENTES (6-24 MESES)
Published in
CoDAS, January 2021
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019219
Authors

Andréa Monteiro Correia Medeiros, Gabriela Rodrigues Dourado Nobre, Íkaro Daniel de Carvalho Barreto, Elisdete Maria Santos de Jesus, Gislaine Aparecida Folha, Anna Luiza dos Santos Matos, Sarah Catarina Santos do Nascimento, Cláudia Maria de Felício

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#18,807,229
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#189
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375,683
of 502,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#24
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.