↓ Skip to main content

Potential of primary kidney cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer mediated transgenesis in pig

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential of primary kidney cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer mediated transgenesis in pig
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-12-84
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Richter, Mayuko Kurome, Barbara Kessler, Valeri Zakhartchenko, Nikolai Klymiuk, Hiroshi Nagashima, Eckhard Wolf, Annegret Wuensch

Abstract

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is currently the most efficient and precise method to generate genetically tailored pig models for biomedical research. However, the efficiency of this approach is crucially dependent on the source of nuclear donor cells. In this study, we evaluate the potential of primary porcine kidney cells (PKCs) as cell source for SCNT, including their proliferation capacity, transfection efficiency, and capacity to support full term development of SCNT embryos after additive gene transfer or homologous recombination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 30%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,917,125
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#388
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,767
of 182,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.