You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of patients with COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2604 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fengtao Wei, Dexiao Kong, Tao Li, Ai Li, Yi Tan, Jinfeng Fang, Xianghua Zhuang, Chao Lai, Weihua Xu, Hong Dong, Chengen Ma, Ke Hong, Yuqin Cui, Shengbin Tang, Fenggang Yu, Chengyun Zheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 39 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,713,122
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#141
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,221
of 455,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.