You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implications of CMIP3 model biases and uncertainties for climate projections in the western tropical Pacific
|
---|---|
Published in |
Climatic Change, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10584-012-0603-5 |
Authors |
Jaclyn N. Brown, Alex Sen Gupta, Josephine R. Brown, Les C. Muir, James S. Risbey, Penny Whetton, Xuebin Zhang, Alexandre Ganachaud, Brad Murphy, Susan E. Wijffels |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 32% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 24% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
Engineering | 5 | 7% |
Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,925,755
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,088
of 5,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,654
of 182,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#32
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.