↓ Skip to main content

Qualification of Standard Membrane-Feeding Assay with Plasmodium falciparum Malaria and Potential Improvements for Future Assays

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Qualification of Standard Membrane-Feeding Assay with Plasmodium falciparum Malaria and Potential Improvements for Future Assays
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazutoyo Miura, Bingbing Deng, Gregory Tullo, Ababacar Diouf, Samuel E. Moretz, Emily Locke, Merribeth Morin, Michael P. Fay, Carole A. Long

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 84 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Student > Master 12 14%
Other 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#93,037
of 199,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,712
of 196,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,119
of 5,406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.