↓ Skip to main content

Supracricoid laryngectomy: the impact of senescence on swallowing safety

Overview of attention for article published in Einstein (São Paulo), April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supracricoid laryngectomy: the impact of senescence on swallowing safety
Published in
Einstein (São Paulo), April 2021
DOI 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021ao5715
Pubmed ID
Authors

Freitas, Andressa Silva de, Zica, Guilherme Maia, Silva, Ana Catarina Alves e, Dias, Fernando Luiz, Freitas, Emilson Queiroz, Santos, Izabella Costa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,579,112
of 19,430,502 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#229
of 347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,591
of 344,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,430,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 347 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.