You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biodiversity at multiple trophic levels is needed for ecosystem multifunctionality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature19092 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Santiago Soliveres, Fons van der Plas, Peter Manning, Daniel Prati, Martin M. Gossner, Swen C. Renner, Fabian Alt, Hartmut Arndt, Vanessa Baumgartner, Julia Binkenstein, Klaus Birkhofer, Stefan Blaser, Nico Blüthgen, Steffen Boch, Stefan Böhm, Carmen Börschig, Francois Buscot, Tim Diekötter, Johannes Heinze, Norbert Hölzel, Kirsten Jung, Valentin H. Klaus, Till Kleinebecker, Sandra Klemmer, Jochen Krauss, Markus Lange, E. Kathryn Morris, Jörg Müller, Yvonne Oelmann, Jörg Overmann, Esther Pašalić, Matthias C. Rillig, H. Martin Schaefer, Michael Schloter, Barbara Schmitt, Ingo Schöning, Marion Schrumpf, Johannes Sikorski, Stephanie A. Socher, Emily F. Solly, Ilja Sonnemann, Elisabeth Sorkau, Juliane Steckel, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Barbara Stempfhuber, Marco Tschapka, Manfred Türke, Paul C. Venter, Christiane N. Weiner, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Michael Werner, Catrin Westphal, Wolfgang Wilcke, Volkmar Wolters, Tesfaye Wubet, Susanne Wurst, Markus Fischer, Eric Allan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 235 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 27 | 11% |
| United States | 22 | 9% |
| Australia | 13 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 9 | 4% |
| Germany | 9 | 4% |
| Japan | 8 | 3% |
| France | 8 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | 3% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 96 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 158 | 67% |
| Scientists | 67 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,411 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1361 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 300 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 289 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 180 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 104 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 66 | 5% |
| Other | 215 | 15% |
| Unknown | 257 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 542 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 373 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | <1% |
| Other | 66 | 5% |
| Unknown | 348 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 299. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#120,038
of 26,007,325 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#7,975
of 99,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,419
of 356,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#168
of 989 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,007,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 989 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.