↓ Skip to main content

Multimodal imaging of the self-regulating developing brain

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multimodal imaging of the self-regulating developing brain
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1208243109
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. M. Fjell, K. B. Walhovd, T. T. Brown, J. M. Kuperman, Y. Chung, D. J. Hagler, V. Venkatraman, J. C. Roddey, M. Erhart, C. McCabe, N. Akshoomoff, D. G. Amaral, C. S. Bloss, O. Libiger, B. F. Darst, N. J. Schork, B. J. Casey, L. Chang, T. M. Ernst, J. R. Gruen, W. E. Kaufmann, T. Kenet, J. Frazier, S. S. Murray, E. R. Sowell, P. van Zijl, S. Mostofsky, T. L. Jernigan, A. M. Dale, T. L. Jernigan, C. McCabe, L. Chang, N. Akshoomoff, E. Newman, A. M. Dale, T. Ernst, A. M. Dale, P. Van Zijl, J. Kuperman, S. Murray, C. Bloss, N. J. Schork, M. Appelbaum, A. Gamst, W. Thompson, H. Bartsch, T. L. Jernigan, A. M. Dale, N. Akshoomoff, L. Chang, T. Ernst, B. Keating, D. Amaral, E. Sowell, W. Kaufmann, P. Van Zijl, S. Mostofsky, B. J. Casey, E. J. Ruberry, A. Powers, B. Rosen, T. Kenet, J. Frazier, D. Kennedy, J. Gruen

Abstract

Self-regulation refers to the ability to control behavior, cognition, and emotions, and self-regulation failure is related to a range of neuropsychiatric problems. It is poorly understood how structural maturation of the brain brings about the gradual improvement in self-regulation during childhood. In a large-scale multicenter effort, 735 children (4-21 y) underwent structural MRI for quantification of cortical thickness and surface area and diffusion tensor imaging for quantification of the quality of major fiber connections. Brain development was related to a standardized measure of cognitive control (the flanker task from the National Institutes of Health Toolbox), a critical component of self-regulation. Ability to inhibit responses and impose cognitive control increased rapidly during preteen years. Surface area of the anterior cingulate cortex accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in cognitive performance. This finding is intriguing, because characteristics of the anterior cingulum are shown to be related to impulse, attention, and executive problems in neurodevelopmental disorders, indicating a neural foundation for self-regulation abilities along a continuum from normality to pathology. The relationship was strongest in the younger children. Properties of large-fiber connections added to the picture by explaining additional variance in cognitive control. Although cognitive control was related to surface area of the anterior cingulate independently of basic processes of mental speed, the relationship between white matter quality and cognitive control could be fully accounted for by speed. The results underscore the need for integration of different aspects of brain maturation to understand the foundations of cognitive development.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
Denmark 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 277 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 25%
Researcher 58 19%
Student > Master 31 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 7%
Other 62 21%
Unknown 31 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 118 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 12%
Neuroscience 29 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 6%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 54 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,048,618
of 17,805,015 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#34,949
of 89,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,813
of 160,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#439
of 972 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,805,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 972 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.