↓ Skip to main content

Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011220.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siao-Nge Hoon, Peter K H Lau, Alison M White, Max K Bulsara, Patricia D Banks, Andrew D Redfern

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 14 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 65%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,079,839
of 20,027,474 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,658
of 12,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,796
of 345,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,027,474 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.