You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In Memoriam: Rolf Kötter (1961–2010)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000965 |
| Authors |
Klaas Enno Stephan, Anthony Randal McIntosh, Claus C. Hilgetag |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| China | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 38% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 25% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 25% |
| Engineering | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,572,103
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,649
of 8,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,895
of 108,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#36
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.