You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Residential Dampness and Molds and the Risk of Developing Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047526 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reginald Quansah, Maritta S. Jaakkola, Timo T. Hugg, Sirpa A M. Heikkinen, Jouni J. K. Jaakkola |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Engineering | 13 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,271,682
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#15,985
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,787
of 202,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#276
of 4,951 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,951 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.