You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
Two different hematocrit detection methods: Different methods, different results?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-3-65 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marco Bosshart, John F Stover, Reto Stocker, Lars M Asmis, Jörg Feige, Thomas A Neff, Reto A Schuepbach, Silvia R Cottini, Markus Béchir |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 26% |
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Professor | 3 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 52% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |