↓ Skip to main content

Dietary advice for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary advice for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004097.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucie Nield, Helen Moore, Lee Hooper, Kennedy Cruickshank, Avni Vyas, Vicki Whittaker, Carolyn D Summerbell

Abstract

While initial dietary management immediately after formal diagnosis is an 'accepted' cornerstone of treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, a formal and systematic overview of its efficacy and method of delivery is not currently available.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 254 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 22%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 70 26%
Unknown 23 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 8%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 36 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,054,410
of 13,865,625 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,173
of 10,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,599
of 146,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,865,625 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.