↓ Skip to main content

Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
74 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
455 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
596 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006145.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Cramp, James Byron-Daniel

Abstract

Cancer-related fatigue is recognised as an important symptom associated with cancer and its treatment. A number of studies have investigated the effects of physical activity in reducing cancer-related fatigue. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library (2008, Issue 1). The original review identified some benefits of physical activity on fatigue in cancer both during and after adjuvant treatment. We identified a number of limitations in the evidence, providing clear justification for an updated review.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 596 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 580 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 112 19%
Student > Bachelor 100 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 13%
Researcher 64 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 7%
Other 114 19%
Unknown 85 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 184 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 98 16%
Sports and Recreations 77 13%
Psychology 32 5%
Social Sciences 22 4%
Other 69 12%
Unknown 114 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 141. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#126,063
of 14,969,364 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#254
of 11,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#884
of 150,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,969,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.