↓ Skip to main content

Exercise for the management of cancer‐related fatigue in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
69 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
697 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
942 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise for the management of cancer‐related fatigue in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006145.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Cramp, James Byron-Daniel

Abstract

Cancer-related fatigue is recognised as an important symptom associated with cancer and its treatment. A number of studies have investigated the effects of physical activity in reducing cancer-related fatigue. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library (2008, Issue 1). The original review identified some benefits of physical activity on fatigue in cancer both during and after adjuvant treatment. We identified a number of limitations in the evidence, providing clear justification for an updated review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 942 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 927 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 146 15%
Student > Master 143 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 11%
Researcher 75 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 6%
Other 161 17%
Unknown 262 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 227 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 147 16%
Sports and Recreations 104 11%
Psychology 42 4%
Social Sciences 31 3%
Other 101 11%
Unknown 290 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#288,345
of 25,382,035 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#486
of 12,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,398
of 191,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.