↓ Skip to main content

Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
73 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
506 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
721 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006145.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Cramp, James Byron-Daniel

Abstract

Cancer-related fatigue is recognised as an important symptom associated with cancer and its treatment. A number of studies have investigated the effects of physical activity in reducing cancer-related fatigue. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library (2008, Issue 1). The original review identified some benefits of physical activity on fatigue in cancer both during and after adjuvant treatment. We identified a number of limitations in the evidence, providing clear justification for an updated review.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 721 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 705 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 128 18%
Student > Bachelor 125 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 12%
Researcher 72 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 7%
Other 124 17%
Unknown 133 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 206 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 121 17%
Sports and Recreations 84 12%
Psychology 33 5%
Social Sciences 27 4%
Other 86 12%
Unknown 164 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2021.
All research outputs
#159,571
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#301
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#981
of 158,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.