You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Detrimental Reaction at the Molybdenum Back Contact in Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 Thin-Film Solar Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Chemical Society, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1021/ja308862n |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan J. Scragg, J. Timo Wätjen, Marika Edoff, Tove Ericson, Tomas Kubart, Charlotte Platzer-Björkman |
| Abstract |
Experimental proof is presented for a hitherto undetected solid-state reaction between the solar cell material Cu(2)ZnSn(S,Se)(4) (CZTS(e)) and the standard metallic back contact, molybdenum. Annealing experiments combined with Raman and transmission electron microscopy studies show that this aggressive reaction causes formation of MoS(2) and secondary phases at the CZTS|Mo interface during thermal processing. A reaction scheme is presented and discussed in the context of current state-of-the-art synthesis methods for CZTS(e). It is concluded that alternative back contacts will be important for future improvements in CZTS(e) quality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 35% |
| Researcher | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 70 | 30% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 40 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 33 | 14% |
| Engineering | 28 | 12% |
| Energy | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 41 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,256,044
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#55,308
of 61,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,615
of 179,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#368
of 501 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 501 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.