You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scale-Free Brain-Wave Music from Simultaneously EEG and fMRI Recordings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0049773 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Lu, Dan Wu, Hua Yang, Cheng Luo, Chaoyi Li, Dezhong Yao |
| Abstract |
In the past years, a few methods have been developed to translate human EEG to music. In 2009, PloS One 4 e5915, we developed a method to generate scale-free brainwave music where the amplitude of EEG was translated to music pitch according to the power law followed by both of them, the period of an EEG waveform is translated directly to the duration of a note, and the logarithm of the average power change of EEG is translated to music intensity according to the Fechner's law. In this work, we proposed to adopt simultaneously-recorded fMRI signal to control the intensity of the EEG music, thus an EEG-fMRI music is generated by combining two different and simultaneous brain signals. And most importantly, this approach further realized power law for music intensity as fMRI signal follows it. Thus the EEG-fMRI music makes a step ahead in reflecting the physiological process of the scale-free brain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Mongolia | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| Italy | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Romania | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 80% |
| Scientists | 10 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 119 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
| Researcher | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 26 | 19% |
| Psychology | 19 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#362,058
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,116
of 225,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,805
of 193,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#80
of 4,735 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,735 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.