↓ Skip to main content

Physiological demands of singing for lung health compared with treadmill walking

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Respiratory Research, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 755)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
48 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological demands of singing for lung health compared with treadmill walking
Published in
BMJ Open Respiratory Research, May 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000959
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keir EJ Philip, Adam Lewis, Sara C Buttery, Colm McCabe, Bishman Manivannan, Daisy Fancourt, Christopher M Orton, Michael I Polkey, Nicholas S Hopkinson

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 29 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Sports and Recreations 9 11%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 32 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 346. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2024.
All research outputs
#99,980
of 26,480,347 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#5
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,976
of 465,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,480,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.