You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Socio-Economic and Health Access Determinants of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Income Countries: Analysis of the World Health Survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0048834 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomi F. Akinyemiju |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Panama | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 315 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 9% |
| Researcher | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 61 | 19% |
| Unknown | 101 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 12% |
| Unknown | 119 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,881,685
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#83,990
of 222,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,460
of 192,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,011
of 4,748 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,748 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.