RT @mathGRbot: This https://t.co/MkPqE4ZeSz has been replaced. Links: https://t.co/Zg0TzDhye9 https://t.co/b1LihKQQtj https://t.co/Z0U7Jrms…
397 followers
397 followers
RT @mathGRbot: This https://t.co/MkPqE4ZeSz has been replaced. Links: https://t.co/Zg0TzDhye9 https://t.co/b1LihKQQtj https://t.co/Z0U7Jrms…
397 followers
This https://t.co/MkPqE4ZeSz has been replaced. Links: https://t.co/Zg0TzDhye9 https://t.co/b1LihKQQtj https://t.co/Z0U7Jrms3M https://t.co/QLrfp7A2d0
397 followers
results to find interesting new examples of pro-$p$ groups which do not occur as absolute Galois groups, which other methods fail to detect. [5/5 of https://t.co/CB02M5gs64]