↓ Skip to main content

Dysplasia-Carcinoma Transition Specific Transcripts in Colonic Biopsy Samples

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dysplasia-Carcinoma Transition Specific Transcripts in Colonic Biopsy Samples
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048547
Pubmed ID
Authors

Orsolya Galamb, Barnabás Wichmann, Ferenc Sipos, Sándor Spisák, Tibor Krenács, Kinga Tóth, Katalin Leiszter, Alexandra Kalmár, Zsolt Tulassay, Béla Molnár

Abstract

The early molecular detection of the dysplasia-carcinoma transition may enhance the strength of diagnosis in the case of colonic biopsies. Our aims were to identify characteristic transcript sets in order to develop diagnostic mRNA expression patterns for objective classification of benign and malignant colorectal diseases and to test the classificatory power of these markers on an independent sample set.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 9%
Ukraine 1 3%
Hungary 1 3%
Unknown 30 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 20%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,172,971
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,801
of 193,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,955
of 179,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,960
of 4,728 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,728 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.