You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human click-based echolocation: Effects of blindness and age, and real-life implications in a 10-week training program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0252330 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam J. Norman, Caitlin Dodsworth, Denise Foresteire, Lore Thaler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 401 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 66 | 16% |
| Spain | 20 | 5% |
| United States | 16 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 4% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Chile | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Unknown | 246 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 362 | 90% |
| Scientists | 26 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1758. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,985
of 25,801,916 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#66
of 224,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305
of 462,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2
of 2,901 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,801,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,901 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.