↓ Skip to main content

Multi-Purpose Utility of Circulating Plasma DNA Testing in Patients with Advanced Cancers

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
13 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-Purpose Utility of Circulating Plasma DNA Testing in Patients with Advanced Cancers
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geraldine Perkins, Timothy A. Yap, Lorna Pope, Amy M. Cassidy, Juliet P. Dukes, Ruth Riisnaes, Christophe Massard, Philippe A. Cassier, Susana Miranda, Jeremy Clark, Katie A. Denholm, Khin Thway, David Gonzalez De Castro, Gerhardt Attard, L. Rhoda Molife, Stan B. Kaye, Udai Banerji, Johann S. de Bono

Abstract

Tumor genomic instability and selective treatment pressures result in clonal disease evolution; molecular stratification for molecularly targeted drug administration requires repeated access to tumor DNA. We hypothesized that circulating plasma DNA (cpDNA) in advanced cancer patients is largely derived from tumor, has prognostic utility, and can be utilized for multiplex tumor mutation sequencing when repeat biopsy is not feasible. We utilized the Sequenom MassArray System and OncoCarta panel for somatic mutation profiling. Matched samples, acquired from the same patient but at different time points were evaluated; these comprised formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) archival tumor tissue (primary and/or metastatic) and cpDNA. The feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity of this high-throughput, multiplex mutation detection approach was tested utilizing specimens acquired from 105 patients with solid tumors referred for participation in Phase I trials of molecularly targeted drugs. The median cpDNA concentration was 17 ng/ml (range: 0.5-1600); this was 3-fold higher than in healthy volunteers. Moreover, higher cpDNA concentrations associated with worse overall survival; there was an overall survival (OS) hazard ratio of 2.4 (95% CI 1.4, 4.2) for each 10-fold increase in cpDNA concentration and in multivariate analyses, cpDNA concentration, albumin, and performance status remained independent predictors of OS. These data suggest that plasma DNA in these cancer patients is largely derived from tumor. We also observed high detection concordance for critical 'hot-spot' mutations (KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA) in matched cpDNA and archival tumor tissue, and important differences between archival tumor and cpDNA. This multiplex sequencing assay can be utilized to detect somatic mutations from plasma in advanced cancer patients, when safe repeat tumor biopsy is not feasible and genomic analysis of archival tumor is deemed insufficient. Overall, circulating nucleic acid biomarker studies have clinically important multi-purpose utility in advanced cancer patients and further studies to pursue their incorporation into the standard of care are warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 198 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Student > Master 31 15%
Other 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 27 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 10%
Engineering 15 7%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 41 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,371,227
of 23,468,283 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,021
of 200,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,074
of 185,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#584
of 4,905 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,468,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,905 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.