You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Microbial community diversity and composition varies with habitat characteristics and biofilm function in macrophyte-rich streams
Oikos, October 2016
Peter S. Levi, Piotr Starnawski, Britta Poulsen, Annette Baattrup-Pedersen, Andreas Schramm, Tenna Riis
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||16||30%|
|Student > Master||5||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||6%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||15||28%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||3||6%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2016.
All research outputs
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Oikos
of 3,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 319,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oikos
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.