↓ Skip to main content

Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Social Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
720 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
950 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences
Published in
British Journal of Social Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.1348/014466608x314935
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy J. C. Cuddy, Susan T. Fiske, Virginia S. Y. Kwan, Peter Glick, Stéphanie Demoulin, Jacques‐Philippe Leyens, Michael Harris Bond, Jean‐Claude Croizet, Naomi Ellemers, Ed Sleebos, Tin Tin Htun, Hyun‐Jeong Kim, Greg Maio, Judi Perry, Kristina Petkova, Valery Todorov, Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón, Elena Morales, Miguel Moya, Marisol Palacios, Vanessa Smith, Rolando Perez, Jorge Vala, Rene Ziegler

Abstract

The stereotype content model (SCM) proposes potentially universal principles of societal stereotypes and their relation to social structure. Here, the SCM reveals theoretically grounded, cross-cultural, cross-groups similarities and one difference across 10 non-US nations. Seven European (individualist) and three East Asian (collectivist) nations (N=1,028) support three hypothesized cross-cultural similarities: (a) perceived warmth and competence reliably differentiate societal group stereotypes; (b) many out-groups receive ambivalent stereotypes (high on one dimension; low on the other); and (c) high status groups stereotypically are competent, whereas competitive groups stereotypically lack warmth. Data uncover one consequential cross-cultural difference: (d) the more collectivist cultures do not locate reference groups (in-groups and societal prototype groups) in the most positive cluster (high-competence/high-warmth), unlike individualist cultures. This demonstrates out-group derogation without obvious reference-group favouritism. The SCM can serve as a pancultural tool for predicting group stereotypes from structural relations with other groups in society, and comparing across societies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 950 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 13 1%
Unknown 903 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 215 23%
Student > Master 149 16%
Student > Bachelor 111 12%
Researcher 83 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 69 7%
Other 154 16%
Unknown 169 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 456 48%
Social Sciences 117 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 101 11%
Arts and Humanities 16 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 1%
Other 67 7%
Unknown 179 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,066,972
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Social Psychology
#343
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,145
of 198,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Social Psychology
#51
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.