↓ Skip to main content

Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008446.pub2
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Esophagectomy followed by esophagogastrostomy is the preferred treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer. It carries the risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagogastric anastomosis, which is one of the most dangerous complications and causes considerable morbidity and mortality. Omentoplasty was recommended in some studies to preventing anastomotic leaks associated with esophagogastrostomy. However, the value of omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy has not been systematically reviewed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Other 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 71%
Unknown 6 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2012.
All research outputs
#6,544,888
of 8,606,919 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,975
of 8,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,454
of 96,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,606,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.