↓ Skip to main content

Macrolide antibiotics for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Macrolide antibiotics for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002203.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin W Southern, Pierre M Barker, Arturo Solis-Moya, Latifa Patel

Abstract

Macrolide antibiotics may have a modifying role in diseases which involve airway infection and inflammation, like cystic fibrosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Other 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 26 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,252,188
of 17,726,748 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,650
of 11,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,789
of 128,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,726,748 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.