↓ Skip to main content

John Locke as a Reader of Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan: A New Manuscript

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Modern History, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 743)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
139 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
John Locke as a Reader of Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan: A New Manuscript
Published in
The Journal of Modern History, June 2021
DOI 10.1086/714068
Authors

Felix Waldmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#232,869
of 17,982,104 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Modern History
#1
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,477
of 219,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Modern History
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,982,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them