↓ Skip to main content

Interictal Dysfunction of a Brainstem Descending Modulatory Center in Migraine Patients

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interictal Dysfunction of a Brainstem Descending Modulatory Center in Migraine Patients
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003799
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric A. Moulton, Rami Burstein, Shannon Tully, Richard Hargreaves, Lino Becerra, David Borsook

Abstract

The brainstem contains descending circuitry that can modulate nociceptive processing (neural signals associated with pain) in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and the medullary dorsal horn. In migraineurs, abnormal brainstem function during attacks suggest that dysfunction of descending modulation may facilitate migraine attacks, either by reducing descending inhibition or increasing facilitation. To determine whether a brainstem dysfunction could play a role in facilitating migraine attacks, we measured brainstem function in migraineurs when they were not having an attack (i.e. the interictal phase).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 5 4%
Brazil 3 2%
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Unknown 124 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Professor 7 5%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 36%
Neuroscience 24 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Psychology 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2018.
All research outputs
#12,864,199
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#100,210
of 193,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,010
of 165,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#373
of 454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.