You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interictal Dysfunction of a Brainstem Descending Modulatory Center in Migraine Patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003799 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eric A. Moulton, Rami Burstein, Shannon Tully, Richard Hargreaves, Lino Becerra, David Borsook |
Abstract |
The brainstem contains descending circuitry that can modulate nociceptive processing (neural signals associated with pain) in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and the medullary dorsal horn. In migraineurs, abnormal brainstem function during attacks suggest that dysfunction of descending modulation may facilitate migraine attacks, either by reducing descending inhibition or increasing facilitation. To determine whether a brainstem dysfunction could play a role in facilitating migraine attacks, we measured brainstem function in migraineurs when they were not having an attack (i.e. the interictal phase). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 5 | 4% |
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
United States | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 124 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 35 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
Professor | 7 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 20% |
Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 36% |
Neuroscience | 24 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 8% |
Psychology | 7 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 34 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2018.
All research outputs
#12,864,199
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#100,210
of 193,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,010
of 165,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#373
of 454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.